USA Citizen’s Intellectual Property Rights

How blatant.  People do not care.  People are Conditioned, Complacent.

Every day the radius of real news draws closer to individuals affected by

the propaganda virus.  They  become “infected” when “affected” by the fake news

virus on the internet.

The infecting persons don’t even care if they give their computer virus or get caught with a computer virus because everyone eventually gets some kind of computer virus on the internet.  Why just today, The US Patent Office caught the propaganda virus, not from me.  But, from someone following me.

I reported it to a reporter this time.  I mean, how many government agencies need to be over taken by this smoke and mirrors disappearing act?

They get caught, they get rewarded more?  Not by me.

The group system failure does not care if it gets caught.

US Patent Office does not care if they get caught and

the persons do not care if they get caught.  Quid Pro Quo.

It gets more information and it spreads if everyone catches it.

If I tell you that the US Patent office is downloading out of the internet with everyone’s information and patent number;  to be used and scrambled, so it’s all free.  It’s dis-information, nothing is sacred, preserved, history or truth anymore.  Nothing.  I can’t tell you what is going on or it will be going on.  A bad rumor mill, isn’t it?

It’s a political statement; It has no right to ‘decide’ for me.

I object to making my patent public information and free use.

If all my “intellectual property” is free.  How can I afford to think freely.  Life has expenses.  I’m not going to give away the icing on the cake, the flick of the fire switch;

or the algorithm to the application.





1:31 PM (22 hours ago)

to me


All access to file applications or follow on documents using EFS WEB are down.  We are currently unable to access any applications to give you a status or resolve an issue using EFS WEB.  We DON’T currently have an ETA for this system.  Please review the USPTO guide lines for submitting documents that apply to your situation.  If you still have your current issue on the next business day please resubmit your email or call the USPTO offices to resolve your filing problems.

Roosevelt Hall
Functional Specialist Agent 28
Patent Electronic Business
Telephone: 1-866-217-9197

EFS-Web Registered and Private PAIR users now have access to DOCX and XML features. Applicants can file structured text via EFS-Web, access structured text submissions, structured text Office actions, and XML downloads via Private PAIR. For additional information, please visit DOCX Intake Quick Start Guide and Access and Download DOCX Quick Start Guide


Patent Intellectual Property
belonging to United State’s Citizens has been
and continues to be downloaded for duplication.
Patent information has been and continues to
be taken / stolen for use:  then;
         “duplication and scramble”
by a red alert dos page spawning program
aka:  “The Propaganda Virus”
It looks like the cat fish, the lone person that wants to ‘catch’ something while it is monitoring the desktop and /or all the social media sites where I go…  for example twitter literally puts a bell on it’s accounts so they can better follow my twitters.  So, of course if I mark an e mail to the us patent office it will red alert steal it from me.  Of course.  How better to catch the loan spreader of this virus?

Really Happening in my life makes it … REAL NEWS

This Fake News is an
Internet Virus Bully
and it is Bad For The World
Because it’s Bad for Human Relations

For five years an internet bully virus has been abusing me personally and professionally.

This includes my banking, in a life that matters to me; and it includes properties that matter to me and would matter to most folks.

The Value Stolen in Words;   In A Text Virus

The Propaganda Virus is programmed to steal and scramble intellectual property.

How can mere words hurt in a text propaganda virus of fake news?

Words can hurt a business with Gossip, Rumors and Innuendos that intends to offend others and carry with it an offensive meaning and understanding;

for example, my small business web site “”   has  ‘a propaganda virus’

web site’ attaching itself on search engines to my stage name.  It uses text describing pornography with child abused then has attached to my small entertainment business web site to ruin my good name and reputation working with children at schools.

I use to work for the school district.  My resume information was stolen by and used against me by the propaganda virus web site.  I had to excuse myself from my job to not  put children, their families and the other teachers and other adults at risk.

The web site describes itself as “Freedom of Speech” by spreading fake news propaganda virus, ruining my career using words.  And worst of all, the children and the schools lost a dedicated person committed to helping children and schools.

Do you think any school would take a chance and hire me after reading I am a pedophile?  After seeing me super imposed into pornography pictures?

Do you think the schools have time to fully back round check me to find out if it’s fake or real?  How does my interview go?  I have to explain this at my interview?  Five years ago when this all started, Trump wasn’t President and nobody used the term, “fake news.”

In addition, the school doesn’t want the virus, so are they going to hire me and put the entire school and staff at risk for the propaganda virus?


“The Propaganda Virus.”     Look Out   !




Fake news in history (yesterday) is designed to damage and devalue intellectual property of tomorrow.  Think about that statement.  If all the history you know and learn is fake, then how can you stop from repeating it?

How can we as a people learn and not make the same mistakes again and again?

Who would want that?

Fake News Damages and Devalues Intellectual Property by people who think it would be cool if everything in the world was free.

Everything in the world is free?  Isn’t that a political idea?

Fake News is a form of attack…   that is political.

If it’s someone’s political opinion being forced upon you,

then are






SSL WHO? Security – UPDATE

The Scoop:

2016 Google enacted a new policy on SSL Security Certificates.

SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) is the standard security technology for establishing an ‘encrypted link between a web server and a browser.’  

This link ensures that all data passed between the web server and browsers  remain “Private and Integral.”

The big hype reason for SSL is to assure security during transactions, specifically credit card transactions and personal information.

You can see the policy at work by looking to the top left of your URL.  There you will see either a lock with the word “secure” or a circle with an  ‘i’  in the middle, for “insecure.”

It’s a wonderful idea, but here is the truth of what is happening:

Large internet companies that have domain name owners or simply individuals who are affiliates are now requiring the affiliates to pay for the SSL certificate fees;  and then telling affiliates to put their personal name and address on the certificate;  except for the e mail address.  

For the e mail address, the domain name affiliate is told to put the large internet company’s  e mail address in the certificate area where the domain name owner’s e mail address should go.

Some large internet companies suggest putting the name of the large internet company as the administrator with no address.  The administrator is the administrator for a domain name and not a web site.

This passes off both the expense of the SSL certificate and the responsibility for any problems associated with the credit card transaction to the domain name affiliate.

However, at no time is the domain name ‘affiliate’ accepting the credit cards, or receiving any personal information.

When there is a problem with a transaction, the responsible party has now become “The Domain Name Affiliate.”

Large Internet Companies use up to 78% affiliate template pages in sales. 

When a domain name owner simply forwards their domain name to a template affiliate site created by the large internet company that accepts credit cards and personal information, the domain name affiliate has now become the responsible party for transactions and personal information gathered by the large internet company.

The large internet company name and address that took the credit card transaction is not given and is not encrypted on the SSL certificate.

The affiliate’s name and information is encrypted and only the e mail address of the large internet company conducting the transaction is given as ‘certified’ security.

This policy is causing major dis-information on the internet and creating more security problems with personal information and credit card numbers.


Large companies are being hacked.  Most recently a credit scoring company that gathered social security numbers and credit card numbers of 124 million users

and on this date that companies URL still reads that it is “secure.”

So, what good is the SSL certificate of encrypting information from web server and browser if the information is wrong and/or scrambled by crackers?  

Many hackers are what is known as ‘crackers.’  They claim their ‘cracking hacking’

is a joke and they scramble the information of large internet companies;

and the large internet companies don’t realize they have been ‘cracked’ for months, sometimes years.  It’s a type of attack and very popular.

The large internet company is cracked and hacked and all the information is taken and scrambled even when the web site reads that it is secure!  

At the time of Googles policy change of June 2016, SSL certificates were issued by respected and well known domain name companies for a fee of approximately $37 per year.  At the time of this writing (14 months later) several new pop up companies are issuing SSL certificates for only $4.99 and they are advertising themselves on Google.  

Dis-information violates Icann and most large internet company’s information system policies and yet, the large internet companies are telling domain name owners who are affiliates to break the large internet company’s own policies and the policies of Icann

 to “YIELD”to Google.


What is it called if Google and affiliates

are selling SSL certificates and SSL certificate companies?


Do SSL Security Certificates constitute “Security Fraud if filled out incorrectly or with false information intentionally withheld?”

Is it possibly inside trading by Google?  Do the companies now selling SSL Security Certificates advertise on Google?  Does Google benefit financially when these new companies pay for advertisement on Google?  Does Google own or control these companies and their growth in capital by accepting and ranking the ads?  And does that growth in capital benefit with more capital to Google?

Update Again:  11/30/17

Conversation with Godaddy regarding SSL and the CSR categories in which to put the data that will be encrypted with transactions.  I explain that the CSR form given to me by the large internet company, affiliate manager does not have the categories to separate the domain name holder and the large internet company’s information.

I further explain that putting my personal address and phone number creates dis-information and possibly holds me responsible for credit card transactions which I am not processing.  I also do not collect any personal information.  The Godaddy employee tells me that it’s very interesting and I need to ask my attorney.  I ask for a recommendation and am told I must call my own attorney.

The Godaddy employee also tells me that it would be interesting to hear back my attorney’s opinion since it’s important to keep up with legal information like this.

Well, gee?

I have also discovered that there are different CSR forms, apparently.  I am uncertain, but have found companies that offer SSL for “all your domain names” and for “business domains vs. personal domains.”  In addition, the fees are sky rocketing for all of this SSL security at approximately $250 – $425 per year.  Considering that the domain name cost $12 per year, this is quote a percentage.

If a company wants to consider having a “secure” “S” read on their url because it’s better for business, then large internet companies might want to consider actually knowing who is processing the credit card.

I have discovered even more shattering information.  Some large internet companies are not processing the credit cards but are out sourcing the transaction to processing companies.

In addition, I originally called Godaddy because in renewing a domain name using PayPal, Godaddy and other large internet companies no longer require their program to ask the user for their PayPal password.  In other words, transactions with PayPal can be made using only “the payment method.”

Godaddy explained it to me like using a credit card vs. a debit card.  A password is not needed when using a credit card, but is needed when using a debit card.

Well, how does that justify using PayPal then?  And a credit card requires “A Signature.”

Again, I come back to the only conclusion that I can derive from all this headache.  The conclusion is that no transaction is secure on the internet and that no user can be certain by any stretch of the imagination that their banking information is safe.

Google algorithm “so called” change to read httpS, The “S” meaning that there is encrypted data to help keep monetary transactions safe in what is called an “SSL” is a very faulty system.

After I have personally verified that there are multiple CSR forms with different categories to fill in on templates, SSL companies offering “Private Keys” which keep the encrypted data ‘Private’ until subpoenaed and Large Internet Companies shirking responsibilities off to their affiliates, I report that this entire system is going to fail and it is going to fail at a maximum economic level.

Users will still need to “subpoena” information when a transaction goes wrong and they will have trouble finding the “service address” in order to serve a petition of complaint.  And even after filing and serving a complaint, the user who was wronged will still not be certain that they are filing and serving the correct party.

With out sourced companies conducting transactions, domain name owners paying for SSL and private keys while providing their own personal information, and then forwarding urls to affiliate template pages;

Most people do not even understand most of this article or what I am describing.  How can any reasonable person believe that this is going to create a “Safer System?”




Update:  11/28/2017

I have Generated a ‘basic’ CSR to discover what is on the form and what will be ‘verified’ and put on the encryption of the credit card transaction and collection of personal data.

The template reads the following with the ‘given example answers’ in parenthesis:

Country  (US)

State  (Texas)

Locality  (San Antonio)

Organization  (Big Bob’s Beepers)

Organizational Unit  (Marketing)

Common Name  (

The information given in the CSR form will be encrypted with a private key (size 2048) on the SSL Certificate.  The private key is then held by the SSL certificate holder to be given out only when requested and to ‘assure security’ of the information on the SSL certificate.

Here is what Godaddy describes as an SSL Certificate:

Please note that Godaddy url reads httpS (meaning secure site) without being logged in.

Please note that Godaddy url reading httP (without the ‘S’) logs onto the same page.

Here is Google search for ‘SSL”….0…1.1.64.psy-ab..…0.g2tlPdnhn1o

Prices are from $87-$425 per year depending on features of multiple domain names and/or with private key to keep data private.  Question, if I hold the key to keep data private, and I can keep that data from credit card transaction users, how does that increase security?

I have filled out the ‘basic’ CRS form and submitted it to several sites.  Their program continues directly to their credit card payment to be received.  I am expected to accept ‘their security with my credit card information’ to get an SSL to show that I am safe to use for a credit card transaction.

Now, how does anyone with knowledge in securities not notice this house of cards?

If I trust a company with my credit card information for an SSL, and that company is not legitimate, they simple give me an SSL that I pass on to my domain name registrar.

And if I use paypal,  sites are now holding “payment” information for paypal…

Copyright 2000 Peggy Penny, accredit Sociologist, Cal Poly Tech University.



HE NEWS is an example of conglomerated lies to the public regarding recycling.

The news reports that California Counties are beginning to eliminate ‘straws’ now from use;  just like grocery bags were eliminated.  But, it’s not for the Ecology that these things are being eliminated from free use.  The reason for the elimination is because the homeless are grouping together and form alliances that are controlling and gaining revenue from the recycling stations in California.


Plastic Bad.

What is really going on here in California.

I am not able to recycle anything because the homeless have a group that gets all the recycling or they harass people in ways I will not share on public forum.  I am not going to get in a fight over used and/or unwanted packaging and recycled trash.


The homeless are grouping themselves together and taking over recycling areas in California.  When a person comes to recycle their cans and bottles, the homeless are blocking the recycling line;  forcing innocent people trying to recycle to wait in never ending lines.  The person eventually becomes frustrated and out of time and most give up their recycling to the person in front of them;  or someone else in the recycling line.

But, those people are homeless intentionally holding up the line until people forfeit their recycled cans and bottles;  then pay off the recycling employee with a percent.  Homeless are even setting up ‘watch outs’ that beg for money at the corners while watching to top off when the police or sheriffs come to shut the down.

I am not able to recycle at home in the County marked recycle bin either because the homeless have a large group that gets all the recycling out of the bin before it’s picked up.  When I try to stop them or call the police, I get harassed with trash and beer cans left on and used to scratch up my car.  I am not going to fight over my used and unwanted packaging or the value of the said ‘trash.’  So, the homeless win, they get their percent.

Cities in California State agencies respond by taking away grocery bags and now straws as a recycling no no,  but Counties are really trying to eliminating all the recyclables they are able to control to help keep the public safe.

Large soda and bottling companies don’t want to change their packaging due to the large cost to their company.  So, Counties can’t stop the aluminum and bottle glass recycling without new State legislation forcing soda and bottling companies to use different ways to package their products.  Unfortunately, there are few choices to replace aluminum and glass bottle packaging;  and so Counties are eliminating as much as they can to protect the public from the homeless groups that are gathering State by State.




Protected: Understanding “Poly Viral Attack” aka: “Panic, Propaganda and/or Ransom” Attacks

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: